Thursday, January 17, 2013
European Court upholds employee’s right to wear ‘symbol of faith’ at work
Shami Chakrabarti, director of human rights group Liberty, called the ruling “an excellent result for equal treatment, religious freedom and common sense”.
Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch |
Source/Credit: The Hindu
By Hasan Suroor | January 15, 2013
LONDON: In a significant ruling, described by Britain’s faith groups as a “victory” for religious beliefs and a setback for “aggressive” secularism, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on Tuesday upheld the right of a British Airways’ (BA) woman employee to wear a cross to work.
It said that Nadia Eweida (60), a practising Coptic Christian, suffered religious discrimination when BA banned her from wearing a small silver cross to work citing its uniform policy which did not permit displaying items of jewellery.
The court ordered the British Government to pay her £1,600 in damages and £25,000 to cover costs. It said the British authorities “failed” sufficiently to protect her rights under Article 9 of the ECHR, which guarantees freedom of thought, conscience and religion.
Ms. Eweida , who went to ECHR after failing to get redress from courts in Britain, said she was “jumping with joy”.
The case had polarised opinion along religious and secular lines with leading Church figures describing BA’s policy as an “attack” on Christianity.
In a sign of the huge interest it had aroused, Prime Minister David Cameron tweeted, “Delighted that principle of wearing religious symbols at work has been upheld — ppl [people] shouldn’t suffer discrimination due to religious beliefs.”
Shami Chakrabarti, director of human rights group Liberty, called the ruling “an excellent result for equal treatment, religious freedom and common sense”.
The National Secular Society said it remained opposed to display of religious fervour in public.
BA said that it had changed its uniform policy following the uproar over the Eweida case in 2006, and that since 2007 she and other employees were allowed to wear “symbols of faith” to work. Ms. Eweida returned to work in customer services at Heathrow Airport in 2007 after the change in policy.
Three other Christians — Lillian Ladele, Shirley Chaplin, and Gary McFarlane — who also claimed religious discrimination at work lost their appeals.
Read original post here: European Court upholds employee’s right to wear ‘symbol of faith’ at work
This content-post is archived for backup and to keep archived records of any news Islam Ahmadiyya. The views expressed by the author and source of this news archive do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of Ahmadiyya Times.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top read stories during last 7 days
-
The top cleric urged Muslims to solve their problems “without interference from their enemies,” condemning those who want to “provoke hostil...
-
Ahmadiyya.news Blasphemy in Pakistan Weekly update ⋅ June 27, 2023 NEWS Pakistan : Abuse of blasphemy laws draws criticism from various...
-
The world leader of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community and Fifth Khalifa, Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad, officially opened Baitur Rahman mosque in Val...
-
“The only borehole supplying about 1,251 students and over 80 teaching and non-teaching staff of the school is very salty and difficult to ...
-
When the water company’s technician visited the site, they found part of the road surface had collapsed and a leak on an eight-inch diamete...
Disclaimer!
THE TIMES OF AHMAD is NOT an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. Any comments irrelevant to the post's subject matter, containing abuses, and/or vulgar language will not be approved.