Thursday, December 12, 2013
Pakistan: Death — the only punishment for blasphemy?
The blasphemy phenomenon takes a horrible turn when a charged mob targets a specific community, locality or a group by burning their houses, looting their valuables and resorting to mass killing.
Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | US Desk
Source/Credit: Daily Times | Pakistan
By Xavier Patras William | December 12, 2013
The Federal Shariat Court (FSC) has ordered the removal of life imprisonment from section 295-C of the blasphemy laws and that the death sentence be the only punishment in 295-C. Justice Fida Hussain, heading the bench, heard a contempt of court petition filed by Advocate Hashmat Habib. The FSC has issued orders to remove the provision of life imprisonment from the blasphemy law, stating that only death is the punishment for blasphemy under section 295-C.
In 1984, a group of conservative lawyers filed a petition at the FSC asking for a law against insult to Islam or the Prophet (PBUH). In 1986, the blasphemy laws, comprising section 295-A and 295-B, were implemented as part of the law of the state. In 1990, under the Hadood Ordinance, 295-C was introduced into the blasphemy laws. It was approved and the then law minister Iqbal Ahmad Khan added the text “death or life” as punishment for blasphemy in section 295-C.
The blasphemy laws have been under debate for their amendment in the hope to stop their misuse as, throughout the years, the marginalised and the weak have been the victims of these laws. In Pakistan, even being accused of blasphemy is equivalent to the sentence itself. Even children are accused, regardless of their age and mental state. We have witnessed this when an eighth grader was accused of mis-spelling a word in her exams. Rimsha, an 11-year-old girl with Down’s Syndrome was framed by a cleric under the blasphemy laws. It needs to be considered that the law clearly states that anyone who deliberately dishonours a religious place or a prophet is accountable.
In the last 30 years, incidents of extrajudicial killings of blasphemy accused have been common. Finding the culprits behind extrajudicial killings in blasphemy cases is not pursued by the victims’ families out of fear of being further victimised. Unfortunately, such killings are brushed under the carpet by the state and the court as they invite wrath. The first such extrajudicial killing took place in 1991 when blasphemy accused Naemat Ahmad was shot dead by some unknown persons. Later, a Muslim, Farooq Sajid, was beaten to death by a mob in Gujranwala. Similarly, Manzoor Masih was gunned down outside the District and Sessions Court after a hearing in the 1990s. Take the case of Lahore High Court (LHC) Judge Arif Iqbal Bhatti, who was assassinated in his chambers after retirement in 1997. The killer said he targeted the judge because he was on the bench that acquitted two Christian men, Salamat and Rehmat Masih, accused in a blasphemy case.
Societies have laws in order to protect people from the actions of other people. It is clearly impossible for everybody in any society to have absolute freedom: as one person exercised that freedom, it would trample upon somebody else’s freedom. Despite the fact that the blasphemy laws are there, the people take the law into their own hands and decide for themselves what the punishment should be. A mentally unstable man was set ablaze outside the police station in Bahawalpur over blasphemy accusations once. These violent incidents clearly challenge the writ of the law and it is clearly evident that these laws are being misused.
Life For All Pakistan, a human rights organisation, has said, “The minorities — the poorest stratum of our society who had received assurances of equal treatment from the founder of the state, Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah — have to bear the brunt of this hatred of ourselves. When the world is outraged by what is done to the women and the minorities here, we respond with xenophobia. The blasphemy phenomenon takes a horrible turn when a charged mob targets a specific community, locality or a group by burning their houses, looting their valuables and resorting to mass killing, examples being of Gojra, Sangla Hill and the most recent one in Badami Bagh, Lahore. They have not stressed to stop the misuse; this law is widely misused to settle personal vendettas and rivalries. Why is such a law being allowed to be used as a tool? How many more innocent lives will it take for the authorities to realise that it is about time to seriously take concrete steps so as to ensure that the laws are implemented and justice is served?”
Xavier Patras William is a human rights activist and can be reached at xave_william@yahoo.com
Read original post here: Death — the only punishment for blasphemy?
This content-post is archived for backup and to keep archived records of any news Islam Ahmadiyya. The views expressed by the author and source of this news archive do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of Ahmadiyya Times.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top read stories during last 7 days
-
"Pakistanis celebrate end of Ramdhan by burning down Ahmadi houses, " said Imarn Jattala, chief editor of Ahmadiyya Times, in a s...
-
... [T]he magistrate hearing the bail application dismissed it while there was a heavy presence of mullahs at the court premises. Ahmad...
-
Ahmadiyya.news Blasphemy in Pakistan Weekly update ⋅ June 27, 2023 NEWS Pakistan : Abuse of blasphemy laws draws criticism from various...
-
Din is hiding in different cities as his name and photos have been distributed to different religious groups advertising that he is an infi...
-
The Ahmadiyya Mosque in the Punjab town came under attack, according to Ahmadiyyas, in an attempt to seize the property by the extremists M...
Disclaimer!
THE TIMES OF AHMAD is NOT an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. Any comments irrelevant to the post's subject matter, containing abuses, and/or vulgar language will not be approved.