Friday, September 9, 2016
From Bloomers to Burkinis: The 150-Year Battle Over Bathing Suits
In the 1850s, there was public outcry over women wearing bathing bloomers; in the 1950s, it was outrage at the bikini. Now the burkini is the latest front in the war over what women can wear to the beach.
Times of Ahmad | News Watch | US Desk
Source/Credit: The Daily Beast
By Sarah Shears | September 3, 2016
In the 1950s, governments in Europe and across the Mediterranean tried to ban and discourage women from wearing a new controversial swimsuit: the Bikini. Now, it’s happening again, but with burkinis—the latest front in a long Western war over what women may wear in public spaces shared with men, especially those by the water that lend themselves to states of undress.
Long before specialized swimwear for women was created, women and men were segregated wherever water and recreational activities were combined. By the middle of the 19th century, when the restorative powers of sea water were all the rage, the fashionable set headed to seashore resort towns. Women would be carried into the ocean in “bathing machines” in which they could strip down to their bathing clothes, closer to long dresses than anything we would call swimwear now, and then descend into the water far from the prying eyes of the men on the beach.
The shift to modern swimwear began far from the beach in the mid-19th century, when American women’s rights advocate Amelia Bloomer began promoting a style of clothing then known as “Turkish Dress,” inspired by the less restrictive harem pants of the Muslim Ottoman Empire and intended to let women move more easily while doing things like walking up stairs while carrying children, doing housework and gardening.
[more ...]
-- courtesy Jonathan MAG
Read original post here: From Bloomers to Burkinis: The 150-Year Battle Over Bathing Suits
This content-post is archived for backup and to keep archived records of any news Islam Ahmadiyya. The views expressed by the author and source of this news archive do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of Times of Ahmad. Times of Ahmad is not an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top read stories during last 7 days
-
Currently there is one voter list that includes all religious groups including Muslims, Hindus, Christians, Zoroastrians, and Sikhs, whereas...
-
"He was not the only victim of Indonesia's blasphemy law, he will likely not be the last one either if the Indonesian government c...
-
"Why are we being asked to condemn the persecution of Ahmadis? Why are we being asked to condemn killing of blasphemers and atheists?...
-
Ahmadiyya.news Blasphemy in Pakistan Weekly update ⋅ June 27, 2023 NEWS Pakistan : Abuse of blasphemy laws draws criticism from various...
-
"Muslims for Life" campaign (www.muslimsforlife.org) was launched last year to commemorate the tenth anniversary of the terrorist...
Disclaimer!
THE TIMES OF AHMAD is NOT an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. Any comments irrelevant to the post's subject matter, containing abuses, and/or vulgar language will not be approved.