Sponsors of the Tennessee bill say it contains “multiple internal checks and balances to protect against potential abuse” in the process of declaring an organization as terrorists. Those provisions should be thoroughly explained to the legislature and to the public to see whether they truly protect organizations from being branded merely for their beliefs.
Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch |
Source/Credit: The Paris Post-Intelligencer
By Parispi | April 26, 2011
It's discriminatory and duplicates federal law
The Tennessee legislature should turn thumbs down on what’s billed as an anti-terrorism law, but which instead is a discriminatory witch hunt that invades federal responsibility. If our lawmakers pass it anyway, the governor should veto it.
Senate Bill 1028/House Bill 1353 was originally known as the “anti-Shariah law bill,” but after objections to its blatant bias against Muslims, all references to that religious code (not known to be practiced anywhere in Tennessee) were removed.
What’s left would allow the state attorney general and the governor, after investigation by the state safety commissioner and the homeland security director, to designate an organization as a domestic terror group. Once that designation is made, any contributions or other “material support” to that group would be illegal.
What’s wrong with that? Lots of things.
For one, designation as a terror group apparently could be based on an organization’s beliefs rather than on its actions. A group may never have been known to violate the law, yet they would be blacklisted. That smacks of Sen. Joe McCarthy’s pursuit of “Reds” in government which ruined careers in the 1950s.
Our Constitution has stern safeguards over the right to express views that are not in the mainstream. As long as they do not advocate violence against the government, people in this country are free to believe what they like, even if it’s hateful.
And speaking of hate groups, the author of the original bill presented to our legislature is an Arizona lawyer who heads the Society of Americans for National Existence, considered a hate group by the Anti-Defamation League.
Sponsors of the Tennessee bill say it contains “multiple internal checks and balances to protect against potential abuse” in the process of declaring an organization as terrorists. Those provisions should be thoroughly explained to the legislature and to the public to see whether they truly protect organizations from being branded merely for their beliefs.
The bill also would seem to confer on state officials powers now vested in the federal government to designate terrorist organizations. Federal agencies have expertise in this area that state officials lack.
The bill seems to be a thinly veiled attack on Muslim extremism. It is offensive to Tennesseans whose faith is Islam, and who have not been shown to be supportive of terrorism.
This bill goes the wrong way. It should be defeated.
-- Via @NJQRN
Read original post here: Anti-Muslim bill should be defeated
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top read stories during last 7 days
-
"Pakistanis celebrate end of Ramdhan by burning down Ahmadi houses, " said Imarn Jattala, chief editor of Ahmadiyya Times, in a s...
-
Din is hiding in different cities as his name and photos have been distributed to different religious groups advertising that he is an infi...
-
Ahmadiyya.news Blasphemy in Pakistan Weekly update ⋅ June 27, 2023 NEWS Pakistan : Abuse of blasphemy laws draws criticism from various...
-
The Ahmadiyya Mosque in the Punjab town came under attack, according to Ahmadiyyas, in an attempt to seize the property by the extremists M...
-
... [T]he magistrate hearing the bail application dismissed it while there was a heavy presence of mullahs at the court premises. Ahmad...
Disclaimer!
THE TIMES OF AHMAD is NOT an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. Any comments irrelevant to the post's subject matter, containing abuses, and/or vulgar language will not be approved.