Tuesday, September 4, 2012
UK: TV historian triggers storm after controversial programme about Islam
The row comes days after Ofcom said it was considering whether to investigate Citizen Khan, the BBC’s new comedy based on a modern Muslim family, after receiving only 20 complaints.
Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | UK Desk
Source/Credit: Daily Mail | UK
By Mario Ledwith | September 2, 2012
Channel 4 has become embroiled in controversy after viewers claimed that a programme distorted the history of Islam.
The broadcaster and regulator Ofcom and received nearly 550 complaints after Islam: The Untold Story was screened last week.
The show’s presenter, Tom Holland, was subjected to a wave of criticism for his investigation into the origins of the religion and its early texts.
He said there was little written contemporary evidence about the life of the Prophet Muhammad, and claimed that the Koran makes little or no reference to Islam’s holy city of Mecca.
Holland, an award-winning writer and historian, received abusive tweets questioning his views on the religion.
Some Twitter users even posted physical threats to the Cambridge-educated historian, while one called him a ‘fool’ for suggesting Islam is a ‘made-up religion’. Ofcom – which received 150 of the complaints regarding the programme’s inaccuracy, alleged bias and offence to Muslims – said it was considering launching an investigation.
The row comes days after Ofcom said it was considering whether to investigate Citizen Khan, the BBC’s new comedy based on a modern Muslim family, after receiving only 20 complaints.
Holland was still locked in debate with his critics on Twitter last night. In one tweet, he even talked of his regret at making the programme, writing: ‘U [sic] are reminding me very effectively why I had vowed to keep off this topic.’
Fury: The programme Islam: The Untold Story, presented by historian Tom Holland, pictured, sparked a backlash on Twitter
The Islamic Education and Research Academy denounced the programme as ‘historically inaccurate’ and published a long paper criticising Holland’s interpretation.
It described Holland’s claim that records of Muhammad do not appear until 60 years after his life as ‘historically obnoxious’.
‘Holland appears to have turned a blind eye to rich historical Islamic tradition,’ wrote the academy.
In a statement defending the programme, Holland rejected claims of bias. ‘This film is wholly in keeping with other series and programmes on Channel 4 where the historical context of world religions has been examined,’ he wrote.
‘We were aware when making the programme that we were touching deeply-held sensitivities and went to every effort to ensure that the moral and civilisational power of Islam was acknowledged.’
Read original post here: TV historian triggers storm after controversial programme about Islam
This content-post is archived for backup and to keep archived records of any news Islam Ahmadiyya. The views expressed by the author and source of this news archive do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of Ahmadiyya Times.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top read stories during last 7 days
-
Dr. Mahdi Ali had traveled to Pakistan as a volunteer to serve in rural area of Punjab and provide free healthcare to poverty-stricken peop...
-
Masood Malik, (55+), who was the actual target of Mullah hate mail had gone to meet his son Umer Malik returning from a travel. Ahmadiy...
-
A number of authors have already signalled the similarities between the initiation rites of the Muslim Brotherhood and Free Masonry. Howeve...
-
China has more Muslims than Syria, while Russia is home to more Muslims than Jordan and Libya combined. Ahmadiyya Times - Staff News | Oct...
-
The bottom line is this . Franklin Graham has a particular point of view and he is Constitutionally entitled to that point of view. Howeve...
Disclaimer!
THE TIMES OF AHMAD is NOT an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.





It appears that ignorance is not the monopoly of mullahs only!
ReplyDelete