Saturday, March 2, 2013
Pakistan: AG, ECP told to respond to five-year-old petition on separate Ahmadi electoral rolls
In his 2007 petition, Kanwar Idrees argued the law discriminated against Ahmadis in particular and allowed other non-Muslim communities to be registered in the joint electoral rolls.
Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | Int'l Desk
Source/Credit: The Express Tribune
By ET Correspondent | March 1, 2013
RAWALPINDI: The Supreme Court (SC) on Thursday directed the attorney general (AG) and the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to respond to a five-year old petition seeking the inclusion of Ahmadis in the joint electoral rolls.
In its order, the three-member bench, comprising Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry, Justice Ijaz Afzal and Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed, also directed the AG and the ECP to explain the constitutional status of former president Pervez Musharraf’s 2002 order which inserted articles 7(b) and (c)in the Constitution, and hence allowed the creation of separate electoral rolls for Ahmadis.
Under Musharraf’s order, if a voter’s belief regarding the finality of prophethood came under objection, he would have to sign a declaration stating he believed Muhammad (pbuh) to be the final prophet. Any voter refusing to sign the declaration would be treated as non-Muslim and have his name deleted from the electoral rolls and registered in a supplementary list.
In his 2007 petition, Kanwar Idrees argued the law discriminated against Ahmadis in particular and allowed other non-Muslim communities to be registered in the joint electoral rolls. Arguing his petition before the court on Thursday himself, Idrees maintained that as Pakistani citizens, he and other Ahmadis should be treated equally in accordance with the Constitution.
Following his arguments, Justice Saeed observed that the joint electoral system was in vogue throughout the country and questioned why such a law was being implemented.
In response to another question from Justice Saeed, the petitioner said that he met with the chief election commissioner to discuss the practice but was told it could not be stopped unless the law was amended through Parliament.
After announcing its orders to the AG and ECP, the bench deferred the hearing of Idrees’s petition till March 11.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 1st, 2013.
Read original post here: AG, ECP told to respond to five-year-old petition on separate Ahmadi electoral rolls
This content-post is archived for backup and to keep archived records of any news Islam Ahmadiyya. The views expressed by the author and source of this news archive do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of Ahmadiyya Times.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top read stories during last 7 days
-
"Pakistanis celebrate end of Ramdhan by burning down Ahmadi houses, " said Imarn Jattala, chief editor of Ahmadiyya Times, in a s...
-
Dr. Mahdi Ali had traveled to Pakistan as a volunteer to serve in rural area of Punjab and provide free healthcare to poverty-stricken peop...
-
I am disappointed in Stephen Harper and our government for siding with the oppressor. Israel is targeting Gaza knowing that innocent Palest...
-
Although the Quran makes the husband responsible for providing for the family and the wife responsible for homemaking, it neither restricts...
-
... [F]ollowing a complaint from a member of the public, police came to his store and threatened to arrest him unless he removed the Tshirt...
Disclaimer!
THE TIMES OF AHMAD is NOT an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.





No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. Any comments irrelevant to the post's subject matter, containing abuses, and/or vulgar language will not be approved.