Saturday, August 31, 2013
Syria Conflict And Just War Theory: The Ethics Of Military Intervention
The language of intervention and no-intervention is meaningless. America has hundreds of military bases around the world. We’ve intervened. The question is what are the limits of American intervention?
Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | US Desk
Source/Credit: Religious News Service (RNS)
By Yonat Shimron | August 30, 2013
Would the “Just War” doctrine justify U.S. military action in Syria, and what is America’s moral responsibility? Here is one of the responses received by RNS. (Edited by RNS for clarity.)
.....
By Stanley Hauerwas, Professor emeritus of theological ethics at Duke Divinity School
What possible grounds does the United States have for intervention? The language of the world’s policeman comes up again. You want to know, ‘Who appointed you the world’s policeman?’
You could say the U.S. can justify the intervention because stability is part of our foreign policy in order to maintain ourselves as the premier country in the world. So it’s smart to intervene. But there’s no moral justification.
Of course (nerve) gas is a terrible weapon. You hear echoes of weapons of mass destruction. And with gas you can’t control it in terms of its indiscriminate effects. But again, I just don’t know how intervention fits under “just war” categories. Syria isn’t attacking the United States.
The U.S. ought to ask the Arab League to do something. Near neighbors have more responsibility in these situations. If the U.S. intervenes, we just reinforce the presumption, which is true, that we’re an imperial power.
The language of intervention and no-intervention is meaningless. America has hundreds of military bases around the world. We’ve intervened. The question is what are the limits of American intervention? Right now there doesn’t seem to be any. President Obama is clearly worried about being involved in an intervention in Syria you can’t get out of. I appreciate that. But America is everywhere.
The just war tradition is based on a series of arguments to be tested before using force against another population. Legitimate and competent authorities must logically argue that the use of force will end or limit the suffering of a people and these forceful actions are the last options after all diplomatic, social, political, and economic measures have been exhausted.
.....
Read original post here: Syria Conflict And Just War Theory: The Ethics Of Military Intervention
This content-post is archived for backup and to keep archived records of any news Islam Ahmadiyya. The views expressed by the author and source of this news archive do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of Ahmadiyya Times.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top read stories during last 7 days
-
"It was reported that the Indian Prime Minister Lal Bahdur Shastri directed Indian Air Force to get Gen Akhtar Hussain Mailk at any co...
-
The current turmoil in Pakistan is a rerun: The elected government has again failed to assert its authority against unconstitutional forces...
-
"Reverence for all human life is the essence of Islamic teaching. This is a time for prayers and efforts to stop such senseless violen...
-
Organizations such as Human Rights Watch and the National Commission of Human Rights (Komnas HAM) have accused the government of not doing ...
-
The number of attacks on Ahmadi graveyards and desecration of Ahmadi graves has steadily risen in Pakistan due to the government's ina...
Disclaimer!
THE TIMES OF AHMAD is NOT an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.





‘Who appointed you the world’s policeman?’
ReplyDeleteAll the countries unwilling fight totalitarins.