Friday, January 27, 2017

Franklin Graham Justifies Trump’s Expected Refugee Ban

“We want to love people, we want to be kind to people, we want to be considerate, but we have a country and a country should have order and there are laws that relate to immigration."

Times of Ahmad | News Watch | US Desk
Source/Credit: The Huffington Post
By Carol Kuruvilla | January 25, 2017

“That’s not a Bible issue,” the prominent evangelical pastor said.

Rev. Franklin Graham, an evangelical pastor and the president of the international Christian relief organization Samaritan’s Purse, sees no problem with the White House’s plans to prevent refugees fleeing war-torn Syria from entering the United States.

For Graham, it’s simply “not a Bible issue.”

President Donald Trump is expected to sign executive orders later this week that could temporarily ban refugees and immigrants from countries his administration deems high-risk, like Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen. According to a draft version of the document obtained by The Huffington Post, priority will be given to religious minorities ― which means Christians in these Muslim-majority countries could be favored over Muslims.

Graham, son of the famous evangelist Billy Graham, has stood firmly behind Trump’s administration since the election, joining the president’s “Thank You” tour and offering a Bible reading at the inauguration.

As the leader of a humanitarian organization that provides relief to victims of war, poverty, and persecution in over 100 countries, Graham is acutely aware of the needs facing refugees in the world’s most troubled regions. Samaritan’s Purse stated mission is to “to follow the example of Christ by helping those in need and proclaiming the hope of the Gospel.”

The organization takes its name from the biblical parable of the Good Samaritan, who went out of his way to help a stranger whose life was in danger.

The Huffington Post spoke with Graham on Wednesday, and asked whether it’s possible to reconcile Trump’s temporary ban on refugees with the Christian commandment to welcome, clothe and feed the stranger, and to be a Good Samaritan to those in need.

Graham said he doesn’t believe those two things need to be reconciled.

“It’s not a biblical command for the country to let everyone in who wants to come, that’s not a Bible issue,” Graham told HuffPost. “We want to love people, we want to be kind to people, we want to be considerate, but we have a country and a country should have order and there are laws that relate to immigration and I think we should follow those laws. Because of the dangers we see today in this world, we need to be very careful.”

The United States has only admitted about 18,000 Syrian refugees since conflict erupted in Syria in 2011. Those who come must submit to a rigorous vetting process that takes from 18 to 24 months and requires the involvement of multiple law enforcement, intelligence and security agencies. Just over 50 percent of applicants reportedly pass this screening process, the majority of whom are women and children. The other half include both denials and cases that are pending.

For Graham, this vetting process isn’t good enough.

“I think it can be better,” he said. “There are some very dangerous people in the world today, especially coming out of the Middle East.”

In the past, Graham has drawn criticism for making inflammatory remarks about Muslims and the faith they practice. He’s demonstrated an inability, or a refusal, to understand the difference between ISIS, a terrorist group, and Islam, a religion followed by 1.6 billion people around the world.

In 2015, Graham proposed a ban on Muslims entering the United States.

In a Facebook post, Graham wrote: “We are under attack by Muslims at home and abroad. We should stop all immigration of Muslims to the U.S. until this threat with Islam has been settled. Every Muslim that comes into this country has the potential to be radicalized―and they do their killing to honor their religion and Muhammad.”

A few months later, then-candidate Donald Trump made banning Muslims a campaign promise.

During the interview with HuffPost, Graham mentioned that Samaritan’s Purse operates an emergency field hospital near Mosul, Iraq. The hospital is prepared to assist civilians who are injured during conflicts between Iraqi Security Forces and Islamic State fighters.

“A lot of our patients are women and children who have been shot in the back as they’re fleeing ISIS, I’ve seen this first hand,” Graham said. “We need to know who we’re letting in this country.”

When asked whether he believes religion should be used to determine whether which refugees should be allowed to enter the United States, Graham told The Huffington Post that he believes persecuted religious minorities around the world ― Jews, Yazidis, and Christians, in particular ― should be given priority.

“We live in a very dangerous world and I think the president’s first priority is to protect the American people and until there is a better system in place for vetting and knowing who comes into America, I believe every person who comes unto the U.S. should be vetted,” Graham said. “We need to know who they are and what they believe, if they share the same core values of freedom and liberty.”

Carol Kuruvilla is Associate Religion Editor, The Huffington Post

Read original post here: Franklin Graham Justifies Trump’s Expected Refugee Ban

This content-post is archived for backup and to keep archived records of any news Islam Ahmadiyya. The views expressed by the author and source of this news archive do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of Times of Ahmad. Times of Ahmad is not an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your comments. Any comments irrelevant to the post's subject matter, containing abuses, and/or vulgar language will not be approved.

Top read stories during last 7 days


THE TIMES OF AHMAD is not an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.