Wednesday, March 22, 2017
Pakistan: Sikhs complain Ahmadiyyas better recognized, move Peshawar high court on census
Advocate Raza Malik informed that the petition had been filed in the Peshawar high court under Article 199 of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973.
Times of Ahmad | News Watch | UK Desk
Source/Credit: The Times of India
By Yudhvir Rana/TNN | March 22, 2017
AMRITSAR: Sikhs in Pakistan have moved court regarding the ongoing census 2017, in which the community was being counted as 'others' and not separately as 'Sikhs'. One of the petitioners, Radesh Singh, informed TOI that the petition had been filed in the Peshawar high court on Tuesday, demanding immediate stopping of the ongoing census, which was being conducted for the first time in 19 years.
"We find it strange that Ahmadiyya community, whose population is even lesser than Sikhs, is mentioned in the census forms, which is a clear indication of discrimination with us," he maintained.
Various religions, including Muslim, Hindu, Christian and Ahmadiyya, have been mentioned in the census forms while Sikhs and Parsis' would be counted under 'others' category, which has irked the community.
Advocate Raza Malik informed that the petition had been filed in the Peshawar high court under Article 199 of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973.
Stating that it was the duty of the government to protect rights of every community, another petitioner Gurpal Singh said that Sikhs were fourth largest community in Pakistan, and if they were ignored, it could create differences between the present government and the Sikh community. "There is a sense of alienation in the community on not finding its presence in the census," he added.
Stating that the last census in the country was held in 1998, Radesh, who is also president of Sikh Committee of Pakistan, said Sikhs' separate counting was essential for community's overall growth. "The data obtained from the census will be used for distribution of national assembly seats, division of financial resources and for the distribution of civil services jobs," he maintained.
Read original post here: Pakistan: Sikhs complain Ahmadiyyas better recognized, move Peshawar high court on census
This content-post is archived for backup and to keep archived records of any news Islam Ahmadiyya. The views expressed by the author and source of this news archive do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of Times of Ahmad. Times of Ahmad is not an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top read stories during last 7 days
-
"Pakistanis celebrate end of Ramdhan by burning down Ahmadi houses, " said Imarn Jattala, chief editor of Ahmadiyya Times, in a s...
-
The blood stains around the residence indicate that a fierce struggle took place at the residence and the assailants faced strong resistanc...
-
Masood Malik, (55+), who was the actual target of Mullah hate mail had gone to meet his son Umer Malik returning from a travel. Ahmadiy...
-
Ahmadiyya’s national president Falah Shams and Imam Matiullah Joyia emphasised the message that from its founding in 1889, Ahmadiyya has ex...
-
The program "How Do We Understand Our Scriptures" is sponsored by the Canal Winchester-Lithopolis Ministerial Association, the Ahm...
Disclaimer!
THE TIMES OF AHMAD is NOT an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.





No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. Any comments irrelevant to the post's subject matter, containing abuses, and/or vulgar language will not be approved.