Is this a real repeal of the Blasphemy Laws? - Sherry Rehman proposes only certain changes. In that the death sentence (Pakistan Penal Code 295 C) be reduced to a 10-year imprisonment. The Bill also recommends that the life imprisonment (section 295 B) be substituted with a five-year imprisonment sentence.
Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | Int'l Desk
Source/Credit: The Express Tribune
By Express | November 26, 2010
Sherry Rehman has submitted a private member bill seeking amendments
ISLAMABAD: Former minister for information and Pakistan Peoples Party legislator Sherry Rehman on Thursday submitted a private member bill in the National Assembly Secretariat seeking amendments to the country’s contentious blasphemy laws.
Rehman proposes that the death sentence (Pakistan Penal Code 295 C) be reduced to a 10-year imprisonment and recommends that the life imprisonment (section 295 B) be substituted with a five-year imprisonment sentence.
The move which is likely to incur the wrath of the country’s religious circles has been under discussion for a long time but up till now, no legislator dared to formally submit any such law due to the matter’s sensitive nature.
Though it is a private member bill and is likely to get across party lines support from the liberal legislators, the religious parties and some right wing parties will be strongly opposed to it.
Rehman has also proposed that a new section 203 A should be added to the PPC which states that ‘anyone making false or frivolous accusation under any of the sections of 295 A, 295 B and 295 C of the PPC shall be punished in accordance with similar punishments prescribed in the section under which the false or frivolous accusation was made”.
Another section has been proposed in the Penal code by the name of section 298 E under which any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination or violence shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for an imprisonment of up to seven years, a fine or both.
The proposed legislation also calls for amendment in section 190 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1898, by adding a new subsection containing the words, “all offences falling within section 295 A, 295 B and 295 C of PPC shall exclusively be taken cognizance by the Court of Sessions and tried by the High Court”.
Another amendment proposed in section 201 of CrPC says that if a complaint is made in writing to a magistrate under sections 295 A, 295 B and 295 C of PPC, he will not take cognizance of it and will forward it to the proper sessions court. In the case that the complaint is not made in writing, such Magistrate shall direct the complainant to the proper Sessions Court.
Rehman has proposed several other amendments in schedule II of the CrPC. In case of offences under 295 A, 295 B and 295 C which deal with use of derogatory remarks against a holy personage, defiling a copy of the holy book and the use of derogatory remarks against the Holy Prophet (pbuh) respectively, the police will not arrest the accused without a warrant and such cases will be tried in High Courts only.
Anyone making false or frivolous accusations under section 295 A, 295 B and 295 C may be arrested without a warrant and such a person can be tried in Sessions Court.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 26th, 2010.
Read original post here: Bill to amend blasphemy laws submitted in NA secretariat
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top read stories during last 7 days
-
"Pakistanis celebrate end of Ramdhan by burning down Ahmadi houses, " said Imarn Jattala, chief editor of Ahmadiyya Times, in a s...
-
Ahmadiyya.news Blasphemy in Pakistan Weekly update ⋅ June 27, 2023 NEWS Pakistan : Abuse of blasphemy laws draws criticism from various...
-
Din is hiding in different cities as his name and photos have been distributed to different religious groups advertising that he is an infi...
-
The Ahmadiyya Mosque in the Punjab town came under attack, according to Ahmadiyyas, in an attempt to seize the property by the extremists M...
-
... [T]he magistrate hearing the bail application dismissed it while there was a heavy presence of mullahs at the court premises. Ahmad...
Disclaimer!
THE TIMES OF AHMAD is NOT an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. Any comments irrelevant to the post's subject matter, containing abuses, and/or vulgar language will not be approved.