The attack, which was conducted by hundreds toward Ahmadis who were gathering at their local leader’s house, left three dead and five injured.
Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch |
Source/Credit: The Jakarta Post
By JP | February 9, 2011
The National Police is questioning a number of officers regarding Sunday's attack on Ahmadiyah followers in Cikeusik village, Pandeglang Regency, in Banten Province.
Those questioned include Banten Police chief Brig. Gen. Agus Kusnadi, Pandeglang Police chief Adj.Sr.Comr. Alex Fauzi Rasyad, Cikeusik Police chief Adj. Comr. M Supur, as well as a number of officers who were in charge when the incident happened.
The attack, which was conducted by hundreds toward Ahmadis who were gathering at their local leader’s house, left three dead and five injured.
Kompas.com said that the questioning, which is under the authority of Internal Affairs chief Comr. Gen. Nanan Sukarna, revolved around whether security measures during that incident had been carried out accordance with procedures.
Nanan also questioned previously Pandeglang Deputy Police chief Comr. Mustika Jaman, and Head of Samapta (Police Reserves) unit Comr. Sahpudin in Pandeglang.
“If [the measures taken] weren’t according to procedures, we will sanction [the officers],” he said
Read original post here: Nat’l Police questions officers on Ahmadiyah incident
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top read stories during last 7 days
-
Ahmadiyya Times Editor's Note: Time and again, Daily Dawn, Pakistan has proved its worthiness and deserving of the slogan, 'Founded...
-
This is not the first time Prophet Muhammad has been mocked in history, and it is wishful thinking to hope it will be the last. To set the ...
-
In the 30-minute video —apparently shot in secret by the Indonesian Ahmadiyah Congregation (JAI) — only about 30 police officers can be seen...
-
The attackers reportedly threw stones and Molotov cocktails at the mosque, leaving shattered glasses and destroyed praying facilities.The at...
-
The bottom line is this . Franklin Graham has a particular point of view and he is Constitutionally entitled to that point of view. Howeve...
Disclaimer!
THE TIMES OF AHMAD is NOT an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.





No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. Any comments irrelevant to the post's subject matter, containing abuses, and/or vulgar language will not be approved.