"There's a difference between freedom of religion and defamation of religion," he relates. "It sounds kind of nice, [it] sounds like religious tolerance and equality -- but in actuality...this resolution...puts a rubber stamp, if you will, on countries that persecute religious minorities, particularly Islamic countries."
Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | US Desk
Source/Credit: OneNewsNow
By Chris Woodward | November 19, 2010
In 2009, the United Nations General Assembly voted to adopt a resolution on the defamation of religion. While that may sound like a good thing, Patrick Beard of Indigenous Outreach International (IOI) believes otherwise.
"There's a difference between freedom of religion and defamation of religion," he relates. "It sounds kind of nice, [it] sounds like religious tolerance and equality -- but in actuality...this resolution...puts a rubber stamp, if you will, on countries that persecute religious minorities, particularly Islamic countries."
Beard, executive director of IOI, says the U.N. resolution is non-binding, but points out the fact that it was sponsored by an Islamic conference is cause for concern -- not to mention that it drew support from Pakistan and Saudia Arabia, which are among the biggest violators of human rights. Venezuela also backed the resolution.
The ministry has now created the website RighttoBelieve.org, which invites people to sign a petition that objects to the resolution, and offers signers an opportunity to promise to pray for the U.N. General Assembly.
Islamic crescent symbol small"Basically, why it matters to us as Americans -- and why it really matters to me as a missionary -- is that countries with an Islamic majority [are] passing blasphemy laws," Beard explains.
And while the U.N. resolution is not a binding resolution, Beard believes if it ever did became a binding resolution, it could become part of international treaty. "We've heard the news over the last few years like the teacher in Sudan who named a teddy bear 'Muhammed' and [then] was jailed and beaten for it," he shares. "That would be one of the laws that would be upheld by this resolution on the defamation of religion."
Beard offers America's military ally Pakistan as another example where blasphemy laws have been implemented. "Only two percent [or less] of Pakistan is Christian...[and yet] of the 900 prosecutions for blasphemy, over half were Christians," he laments.
Beard made his comments recently on American Family Radio's "Today's Issues" program.
Read original post here: Caution urged on U.N. resolution
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top read stories during last 7 days
-
The worst part, of course, is that SA also send tons of money - one way or another - to slowly enforce their own brand of Islam: Wahhabism....
-
“Jesus isn’t Muslim. To insinuate that he is, is a lie, an absurdity. Our motive is just simply to defend the church and promote the Gospel...
-
“Despite the numerous martyrdoms that have befallen this family, they continue to bear these great difficulties with bravery and patience....
-
According to many media reports, the Islamist mob is backed by the brother of Tahir Ashrafi, chairman of the Pakistan Ulema Council. Fi...
-
The blood stains around the residence indicate that a fierce struggle took place at the residence and the assailants faced strong resistanc...
Disclaimer!
THE TIMES OF AHMAD is NOT an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.




No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. Any comments irrelevant to the post's subject matter, containing abuses, and/or vulgar language will not be approved.