Thursday, January 12, 2012

Pakistan: Aamir and Aasia – A tale of two blasphemies

What secret gauge to determine the authenticity of one’s repentance do the Mullahs possess? Why, for instance, are Aasia Bibi’s constant and regular pleas of innocence and repentance not genuine? Why, even when no evidence of her blasphemy exists, is she not a candidate for pardon?

Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch | US Desk
Source/Credit: The Pursuit of Light | Blog
By Kashif N. Chaudhry, MD | January 11, 2012

I completely agree. God is very forgiving and Merciful and forgives the biggest of sins. He is the ultimate judge

Everyone knows Aamir Liaquat and everyone sure knows Aasia Bibi too. One is a celebrated religious scholar, the other a poor Christian mother rotting in a Pakistani jail, victim to the State’s notorious blasphemy laws, which are mostly used to settle grudges and persecute minorities. Before going any further, let me summarize these opprobrious laws:



Pakistan Penal Code Offense Penalty
295-B Defiling copy of Holy Quran Imprisonment for life
295-C Use of derogatory remarks in   respect of the Holy Prophet Death, or imprisonment for   life, and liable to fine.
298-A Use of derogatory remarks in   respect of holy personages viz. Ummul Mumineen, Ahle-bait,   Khulafa-e-Rashideen and Sahaaba Three years imprisonment, or   fine, or both.
298-B Ahmadi using “Islamic   epithets”, referring to place of worship as “masjid”, or saying the “Azan” Three years imprisonment, and   shall also be liable to fine.
298-C Ahmadi calling himself a   Muslim or referring to his faith as Islam Three years imprisonment, and   shall also be liable to fine.

Aasia Bibi is a poor lady from Sheikhupura, Pakistan. In June of 2009, some of her Muslim fellow workers refused to drink the water she had fetched as they considered Christians to be “unclean.” An argument ensued. There had already been a feud between Aasia and a neighbor about some property damage. Aasia was quickly accused of making derogatory comments about Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). She was beaten by a mob before being assaulted by police for her alleged remarks, proof of which there is none. Aasia is presently on the death row in Pakistan. Two prominent statesmen have been assassinated after speaking for her and suggesting reform in the infamous blasphemy laws.

Aasia has denied ever making any degrading remarks.  Despite this, she remains imprisoned and recently spent her third Christmas in jail praying and fasting.

On the other hand, It is well known that Aamir Liaquat (no, he is not a “Dr”) uttered multiple objectionable and humiliating remarks against the companions of the Holy Prophet (pbuh).  If anyone was in doubt of this, video evidence of his statements abound. Technically, he is guilty under section 298-A of Pakistan’s Penal Code, which prescribes a three year imprisonment or a fine or both. However, this proven ”criminal” gets away with no penalty. He enjoys complete immunity and continues to host a religious TV program on ARY. Apparently, other religious clerics have come to his rescue. They have issued an edict stating that his repentance on the 27th of Ramadan was true and in perfect accordance with the requirements of Shariah.

What are these requirements of Shariah? Crying out loud on National TV? Repenting during the 27th night of Ramadan?

Amongst other statements, the following saying of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was quoted in Aamir’s defense:

“Verily, Allah is more pleased with the repentance of His slave than a person who has his camel in a waterless desert carrying his provision of food and drink and it is lost. He, having lost all hopes (to get that back), lies down in shade and is disappointed about his camel; when all of a sudden he finds that camel standing before him. He takes hold of its reins and then out of boundless joy blurts out: ‘O Allah, You are my slave and I am Your Rubb’.He commits this mistake out of extreme joy”. (Muslim)

I completely agree. God is very forgiving and Merciful and forgives the biggest of sins. He is the ultimate judge.

However, this edict leaves us with a number of questions. What secret gauge to determine the authenticity of one’s repentance do the Mullahs possess? Why, for instance, are Aasia Bibi’s constant and regular pleas of innocence and repentance not genuine? Why, even when no evidence of her blasphemy exists, is she not a candidate for pardon?

The fact that Pakistan’s blasphemy laws do not apply to Aamir while punishing Aasia is evidence enough of their intent to punish the weak minorities of the country. They are a tool in the hands of the Mullahs, used specifically against those they despise. It is yet another example of the deep hypocrisy that exists in our society and institutions.

I do not say that Aamir be punished. I merely say that Aasia be treated an equal Pakistani and allowed the freedom that Aamir enjoys. If not, we must all  be very clear – this law is a farce! It must go!


Read original post here: Aamir and Aasia – a tale of two blasphemies

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your comments. Any comments irrelevant to the post's subject matter, containing abuses, and/or vulgar language will not be approved.

Top read stories during last 7 days

Disclaimer!

THE TIMES OF AHMAD is NOT an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.