The more I have understood the suffering caused by the Occupation, the more I am infuriated by statements that begin with "the Occupation is terrible, but...“. Statements like "the Occupation is terrible, but Palestinians have supported gruesome methods of terrorism" are in some cases correct but they are also wrong, in my opinion, because they lack true empathy for human suffering.
Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch |
Source/Credit: Common Ground News Service
By Moriel Rothman | February 14 2012
Jerusalem - Late last month I went to the children's memorial in Yad Vashem, the Holocaust memorial museum in Jerusalem. I stood there and took in the names, the candles and the glass. And I felt confused and sad and a little bit broken.
It was 27 January, International Holocaust Remembrance Day, and it was the first time I had gone to the memorial in five years. I went because I wanted to reclaim a small part of myself and my history from the tornado of political and historical ownership that twists so jaggedly in this place.
When I realised that International Holocaust Remembrance Day was approaching, my first thought was, "great – another opportunity for Israel's leaders to make the world feel guilty and back away from their criticism of its settlements." After reading the works of Jewish philosopher Hannah Arendt, who wrote in the 1960s about using the Holocaust to justify Israeli injustices, and hearing Benyamin Netanyahu’s rhetorical use of the Holocaust recently in the US Congress, I have reached a point where I hear “Holocaust” and think about trends in Israeli-Palestinian politics that I do not like.
What led me to Yad Vashem was the realisation that my thinking about Israeli-Palestinian issues has changed the way that I think about the Holocaust. I have become deeply frustrated by the political manipulation of the Holocaust to distract from Israel's crimes against Palestinians. These crimes should not and need not be compared to Nazi crimes, but they are unjust and immoral in their own right.
There is something deeply wrong with this new way of thinking about the Holocaust. It is not the substance of the thought that is wrong. Many Israeli leaders do cynically use the Holocaust to deflect criticism of a controversial policy. What is wrong, though, is the fact that such a thought is the first thing that came to my mind on Holocaust Remembrance Day.
I, like many individuals on the Jewish left, have made a concerted effort to understand Palestinian suffering and to try to grasp how the suffering inflicted by the Occupation could lead a large portion of a people to embrace an ideology that supports using violence against innocent people through bombing cafes and buses.
I am proud to say that after much searching and struggling, I am able to sincerely empathise with Palestinian suffering, even as I do not endorse methods of violence and collective punishment.
The more I have understood the suffering caused by the Occupation, the more I am infuriated by statements that begin with "the Occupation is terrible, but...“. Statements like "the Occupation is terrible, but Palestinians have supported gruesome methods of terrorism" are in some cases correct but they are also wrong, in my opinion, because they lack true empathy for human suffering.
So the fact that my first thought on International Holocaust Remembrance Day was something like "the Holocaust was horrific, but it is exploited for political purposes" is not acceptable at all. This kind of thinking has reduced my ability to empathise with the tragic suffering of my own people and my ability to understand why many of them may have embraced militaristic views.
Israeli Jewish fear is real. It may be unwarranted in some cases, and exaggerated in others, but it is important to understand how an extended period in recent history in which one-third of the world's Jews were systematically exterminated could lead people to be fearful of virulent anti-Semitism as expressed by some leaders in the Middle East.
Anti-Semitism is certainly not the driving factor behind all opposition to Israel, but it did not "end with the Holocaust" and it is a factor to be taken very seriously in certain contexts.
I will continue to fervently oppose the idea that every person who criticises Israel is anti-Semitic, and especially viewpoints that legitimise violence against non-Jews. But I do want to try to open myself up to empathising more with the very real suffering that can lead to those views.
And I want to continue to grapple with the legacy of the Holocaust, to increase my ability to empathise, to better hone my love for people and for life and my hatred of injustice and violence.
So I went and stood in Yad Vashem, not to compare or to contrast, not to gather facts or sharpen my arguments, not even to critique or challenge, but to simply bear witness to and mourn the pain and suffering that the Holocaust inflicted on millions of people.
-------------------
Moriel Rothman is an American-Israeli activist and writer. He is currently living in Jerusalem as a New Israel Fund/Shatil Social Justice Fellow and is active with Rabbis for Human Rights. This article was written for the Common Ground News Service (CGNews).
Read original post here: Detangling the Holocaust from Israeli-Palestinian politics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top read stories during last 7 days
-
Dr. Mahdi Ali had traveled to Pakistan as a volunteer to serve in rural area of Punjab and provide free healthcare to poverty-stricken peop...
-
The bottom line is this . Franklin Graham has a particular point of view and he is Constitutionally entitled to that point of view. Howeve...
-
A number of authors have already signalled the similarities between the initiation rites of the Muslim Brotherhood and Free Masonry. Howeve...
-
Masood Malik, (55+), who was the actual target of Mullah hate mail had gone to meet his son Umer Malik returning from a travel. Ahmadiy...
-
This is not the first time Prophet Muhammad has been mocked in history, and it is wishful thinking to hope it will be the last. To set the ...
Disclaimer!
THE TIMES OF AHMAD is NOT an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.





No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. Any comments irrelevant to the post's subject matter, containing abuses, and/or vulgar language will not be approved.