Although some lawmakers have called on Parliament to exercise restraint in approving the death penalty, others are calling for the dissolution of Parliament if the amendment is not approved.
Ahmadiyya Times | News Watch |
Source/Credit: Human Rights First
By Pamela Kling Takiff | April 19, 2012
Last week, a criminal court in Kuwait convicted writer Mohammed Al-Mulaifi of blasphemy and sentenced him to seven years of hard labor for comments he posted on Twitter. The court ruled that he had slandered an Imam and undermined the Shiite faith by saying that Kuwait “suffers from sectarian struggles and conflicts.”
Al-Mulaifi is not alone. There has been a steady rise in the number of criminal prosecutions against users of social media expressing religious or political sentiments deemed offensive to Islam—and not just in Kuwait.
Under current law, the punishment for blasphemy in Kuwait carries a prison term which varies depending upon the severity of the charges. But now members of Parliament—who have vowed “zero tolerance” for “serious offenses”—may follow the lead of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia in making blasphemy punishable by death. On April 12, lawmakers voted in favor of an amendment that would do just that. To become law, the amendment must be voted on again in the next two weeks and then gain final approval by Kuwait’s ruler.
The amendment not only poses a serious threat to freedom of expression and religion; it can also result in devastating consequences for those holding views that differ from the majority religion or belong to a minority faith. Members of Parliament who support this amendment argue that this law will help to prevent discrimination and promote freedom of religion. In fact, such laws create an atmosphere of intolerance and enable the government to decide which ideas are acceptable and which are not.
Although some lawmakers have called on Parliament to exercise restraint in approving the death penalty, others are calling for the dissolution of Parliament if the amendment is not approved. Individuals such as Hamad Al-Naqi, a Kuwaiti Shiite arrested in March for using Twitter to allegedly defame Mohammad, have reason to be concerned.
In our newly updated report, Blasphemy Laws Exposed: The Criminalization of Defamation of Religions, Human Rights First highlights recent cases in several countries—Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Iran, Kuwait, Malaysia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey—where users of social media have been targeted, charged, and punished, sometimes with prison time, for exercising their right to freedom of expression.
The surge in cases will not likely subside given the growth of social media around the world and the ambiguity in the laws being used to stifle the free exchange of ideas.
Human Rights First recognizes that some of these cases involve expression that may be characterized as offensive. Nonetheless, much can and should be done to confront problems of intolerance, discrimination and violence without restricting speech.
Read original post here: Possible Death Penalty for Blasphemy in Kuwait Puts Users of Social Media on Alert
This content-post is archived for backup and to keep archived records of any news Islam Ahmadiyya. The views expressed by the author and source of this news archive do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of Ahmadiyya Times.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top read stories during last 7 days
-
Ahmadiyya Times Editor's Note: Time and again, Daily Dawn, Pakistan has proved its worthiness and deserving of the slogan, 'Founded...
-
This is not the first time Prophet Muhammad has been mocked in history, and it is wishful thinking to hope it will be the last. To set the ...
-
In the 30-minute video —apparently shot in secret by the Indonesian Ahmadiyah Congregation (JAI) — only about 30 police officers can be seen...
-
The attackers reportedly threw stones and Molotov cocktails at the mosque, leaving shattered glasses and destroyed praying facilities.The at...
-
The bottom line is this . Franklin Graham has a particular point of view and he is Constitutionally entitled to that point of view. Howeve...
Disclaimer!
THE TIMES OF AHMAD is NOT an organ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, nor in any way associated with any of the community's official websites. Times of Ahmad is an independently run and privately managed news / contents archival website; and does not claim to speak for or represent the official views of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. The Times of Ahmad assumes full responsibility for the contents of its web pages. The views expressed by the authors and sources of the news archives do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Times of Ahmad. All rights associated with any contents archived / stored on this website remain the property of the original owners.





No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. Any comments irrelevant to the post's subject matter, containing abuses, and/or vulgar language will not be approved.